Rawlsian Relativism and Background Theories
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Paradox and Relativism
Since the time of Plato, relativism has been attacked as a self-refuting theory. Today, there are two basic kinds of argument that are used to show that global relativism is logically incoherent: first, a direct descendent of the argument Plato uses against Protagoras, called the peritrope; and, second, a more recent argument that relativism leads to an infinite regress. Although some relativis...
متن کاملIndexical Relativism versus Genuine Relativism
The main purpose of this paper is to characterize and compare two forms any relativist thesis can take: indexical relativism and genuine relativism. Indexical relativists claim that the implicit indexicality of certain sentences is the only source of relativity. Genuine relativists, by contrast, claim that there is relativity not just at the level of sentences, but also at propositional level. ...
متن کاملRawlsian Justice and Palliative Care.
Palliative care serves both as an integrated part of treatment and as a last effort to care for those we cannot cure. The extent to which palliative care should be provided and our reasons for doing so have been curiously overlooked in the debate about distributive justice in health and healthcare. We argue that one prominent approach, the Rawlsian approach developed by Norman Daniels, is unabl...
متن کامل(Gauge-) Natural Theories and Background Independence
Geometric objects on manifolds form natural bundles, and one can work with sections of these bundles. In this paper we shall review the structural features of classical fields in the (gauge-)natural bundles framework. We shall discuss various types of interactions between fields, stressing on background dependence and independence. Finally we shall give a gauge natural formulation to general re...
متن کاملRelativism: Protagoras and Nelson Goodman
پروتاگوراس در یونان باستان و نلسون گودمن در دورۀ جدید دو تن از برجستهترین مدافعان نسبیگرایی به شمار میروند. گاه ممکن است نثر آن دو فریبنده بنماید، و چه بسا این امر شرح و تفسیر منظور و مراد حقیقی آنها را دشوار سازد. پروتاگوراس و گودمن، با وجود برخی تفاوتها، به دفاع از این دیدگاه به ظاهر افراطی میپردازند که همه وقایع، به معنای حقیقی کلمه، وابسته به دیدگاه انسان است. هدف این مقاله شرح و بررسی ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Auslegung: a Journal of Philosophy
سال: 1985
ISSN: 0733-4311
DOI: 10.17161/ajp.1808.9108